One hundred and fifty years since the
Emancipation Proclamation was signed into existence, slavery has once again
become a hot-button topic in American cinema.
Arguably two of the biggest cinematic
releases on show at the moment are Quentin Tarantino’s Django Unchained and Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln. The former is a stylized romantic quest/social injustice
revenge flick set in the antebellum South, the latter an inherently worthy
dramatization of the life of the eponymous Commander in Chief in the days
commencing the end of the Civil War and the abolition of slavery.
Both of these films deal with that specter
of the American psyche in very different, one could even say polarized ways – Django is all violence and pop culture
and the N-word, a schlocky slice of exploitation; Lincoln is all serious social issues, character moments, and
impassioned speechifying in the House of Congress.
Returning to Quentin Tarantino and his
obsession with his hit-and-miss ratio, I think there’s an argument to be made
that the last exceptional film that Spielberg directed was Munich, all the way back in 2005.* After the disappointingly
saccharine affair that was 2011’s War
Horse, Lincoln marks something of
a return to form.
Tony Kushner, Pulitzer Prize winning
playwright of Angels in America, deftly
handles the duel conundrums of slavery and the Civil War – the conflicting need
to end each one without expense of the other being the key question that
occupies the mind of Daniel Day-Lewis’ Lincoln.
Day-Lewis is demonstrably the foremost
screen actor in the world at this point – equally at home playing sensitive
cripples (as in My Left Foot) or
megalomaniacal oil barons (There Will Be
Blood), I can only imagine the anxiety of anyone who finds himself opposite
Day-Lewis in the Best Actor category come award’s season. His Lincoln is a
gentle, understated individual, prone to off-the-cuff anecdotes about paintings
of George Washington hanging in water closets or Euclid’s common notions. You
are never left in doubt as to his fierce morality, his political acumen, or the
intractability of his mind. He is the calm center of a world torn apart by
cannon-fire and by prejudice.
Spielberg’s direction is unshowy, almost
theatrical upon occasion, with plenty of dramatic showpieces to highlight his
actor’s strengths – from the paneled hallways of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
through which the controversial Mrs. Lincoln drifts, Havisham-like, consumed by
grief and rage, to the raucous House of Congress, in which Thaddeus Stevens,
pro-abolition Republican, sits, crustily ensconced, ready to rise at a moments
notice in vituperative defense of the 13th Amendment (Sally Field and Tommy Lee
Jones in the film’s two strongest and most focal supporting performances).
The main body of the film surrounds the
politicking, the glad-handing, the betrayals, that surrounded those two major
issues. Though Lincoln occasionally
slips into (superlatively well-written) sermonizing, it never becomes weighed
down with the weight of its historical baggage.
Running at two and a half hours, with a
deluge of recognizable character actors flooding the screen at every moment –
notably David Straitharn (Good Night and
Good Luck) as Secretary of State William H. Seward, Jared Harris (Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, Mad Men) as Lt. Generald Ulysses S.
Grant, Joseph Gordon-Levitt (Looper)
as Lincoln’s oldest son Robert. They occasionally blur together and perhaps a
few of them could have been eliminated, but they serve to provide texture to
1860s Washington. When actors the caliber of James Spader (multiple Emmy
winner), Tim Blake Nelson, and John Hawke (Oscar nominee) are available to play
a trio of comedy carpetbaggers carrying out a campaign of dirty tricks in order
to secure the vote for their President, the more’s the merrier.
Lincoln handles
itself with confidence, aplomb, and (for the most part) commendable lightness
of touch. It’s hard not to feel a sense of elation when certain events come to
pass – it’s almost enough to renew confidence in the democratic process,
regardless of all the shady dealings that have gone on behind the scenes.
There’s a case to be made, without sounding
too portentous, that this is a film America needs right now, especially
following the acrimony of the recent election: a film where the Republican
Party is a force for progress, where the majority of Democrats are the ones
making an impassioned (if wrongheaded) plea for traditionalism. When Lincoln
implores, “Shall we stop this bleeding?”, it’s hard not to, even outside of the
context of civil war, to understand where he’s coming from.
Lincoln,
to lay some charges against it, is perhaps overlong, and it’s cinematography,
captured by Janusz Kaminski, tends to view the events playing out before us
through an obfuscating chiaroscuro haze. It’s historical accuracy has been and
continues to be debated – the role of black Americans, though they are shown as
soldiers in the conflict and as house servants, is sidelined. When Elizabeth Keckley
(Gloria Reuben), Mrs. Lincoln’s dressmaker and a freed slave, discusses with
the Great Emancipator what the amendment means to her, we understand where she
is coming from, but never who she truly is. In a world where to be black was to
be devalued, dehumanized, this is perhaps an inevitable fault.
However, Lincoln
has lofty ambitions and it straddles them well. That the 6’ Day-Lewis
somehow manages to capture the stature of the 6’ 4” Lincoln, to loom over all
yet seem to stoop while doing it, perfectly captures the spirit of the film,
and is a minor miracle of itself.
Verdict: It
may lack the anguish of Schindler’s List or
the intimacy of Amistad – Spielberg’s
previous engagement with the evils of slavery – but Lincoln is nevertheless a remarkable film. Even John Williams’ is a
comparatively restrained affair. Compact and often touchingly subtle, when
Lincoln heads at last for Ford’s Theater, we understand the weight of history
upon his shoulders and the weariness soon to be lifted. Character study, societal
account, political epic – Lincoln is
showcase cinema. Bravo.
No comments:
Post a Comment